In our Corona times, one of the definitions of journalism that I've heard twenty years ago, while pursuing a Master's degree in Journalism Studies at the School of Journalism, Media and Culture at Cardiff University, Wales, UK, pops up again and again: No, not "critical inquiry" (that seems to belong to the wishful thinking-category) but: "Giving interested parties a platform." The reason is simple: media owners profit. It goes without saying that to profit is not only the goal of media owners, it is the defining feature of our money-driven times.
Nevertheless, the media provide lots of useful information during the present pandemic by giving scientists a platform. What a relief for once to hear such mostly sober voices. Unfortunately, platforms were also provided for people with exclusively self-serving agendas. This is unavoidable, one of the arguments goes, for journalists are neither judges nor censors.
Well, of course they fit these roles for they decide to whom to give a voice. And there seems to be a worldwide consensus that elected officials need to be covered. Even more so when the official in question happens to be a notorious liar, for his lies need to be exposed. Really?
For more, see here
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen